Karl Cheng 42d5dbe544 Remove private field shorthand ...

There seems to be tentative agreement to remove the private field
shorthand given the added confusion and edge cases involved with the
shorthand.

Refs: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/21

2017-07-25 11:53:38 +10:00

..

asi-failure-generator

Remove private field shorthand

2017-07-25 11:53:38 +10:00

asi-failure-inline

Modify grammar to support Private Fields proposal: (#260)

2017-05-22 11:33:48 -04:00

asi-success

Add static private class field support

2017-07-02 01:44:12 -04:00

failure-computed

Fix parsing of private fields (#566)

2017-06-06 11:42:07 -04:00

failure-delete-private-property

Throw on attempt to delete a private field

2017-06-23 18:34:59 +10:00

failure-method

Fix parsing of private fields (#566)

2017-06-06 11:42:07 -04:00

failure-numeric-literal

Fix parsing of private fields (#566)

2017-06-06 11:42:07 -04:00

failure-numeric-start-identifier

Add private fields numeric name test

2017-06-23 18:34:59 +10:00

failure-shorthand

Remove private field shorthand

2017-07-25 11:53:38 +10:00

failure-string-literal

Fix parsing of private fields (#566)

2017-06-06 11:42:07 -04:00

inline

Add static private class field support

2017-07-02 01:44:12 -04:00

nested

Remove private field shorthand

2017-07-25 11:53:38 +10:00

pbn-success

Remove private field shorthand

2017-07-25 11:53:38 +10:00

static

Add static private class field support

2017-07-02 01:44:12 -04:00