This PR removes the `/nx-api` pages from `nx-dev`. They are already
redirected from `/nx-api` to either `/technologies` or
`/reference/core-api` URLs.
e.g. `/nx-api/nx` goes to `/reference/core-api/nx` and `/nx-api/react`
goes to `/technologies/react/api`
**Changes**:
- Remove old `nx-api.json` from being generated in
`scripts/documentation/generators/generate-manifests.ts` -- this was
used to generate the sitemap
- Remove `pages/nx-api` from Next.js app since we don't need them
- Remove workaround from link checker
`scripts/documentation/internal-link-checker.ts` -- the angular
rspack/rsbuild and other workarounds are gone now that they are proper
docs in `map.json`
- Update Powerpack/Remote Cache reference docs to exclude API documents
(since they are duplicated in the Intro page) --
`nx-dev/models-document/src/lib/mappings.ts`
- All content in `docs` have been updated with new URL structure
**Note:** Redirects are already handled, and Claude Code was used to
verify the updated `docs/` URLs (see report below). The twelve 404s
links were updated by hand.
## Verification Report
https://gist.github.com/jaysoo/c7863fe7e091cb77929d1976165c357a
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
Users migrating from Nx 17 can go up to Nx 20.
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
Users migrating from Nx 19 can go up to Nx 21. Users migrating from Nx
17 or 18 should go to Nx 19 first.. then go to Nx 21.
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
This PR is the same as https://github.com/nrwl/nx/pull/30187 but for
`@storybook` packages. We want to make sure that workspaces that have
other `@storybook/*` packages installed have their versions updated
along with the packages we use. Otherwise version mismatches can lead to
errors due to changing APIs.
This PR also adds a conformance rule that prevents mistakes from going
out in future migrations.
This PR removes migrations that are unused in our packages.
Other changes:
- Update the `remove-migrations` generator to remove all files inside
the migration directory, rather than just the implementation, spec file,
and `__snapshots__` directory. There were some helpers that were not
removed due to this problem.
- Add a check to the `assertValidMigrationPaths` test util (used in
`migrations.spec.ts` test files) to ensure that all paths inside
`./src/migrations` are included in `migrations.json` file. There were a
few migrations missing in the `@nx/expo` package, and we never run them
nor cleaned them up.
**Note:** This has no effect on users and is purely a clean-up.
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
Currently, when we use generator's via the CLI passing the `name` arg
has more than one responsibility:
1. it can be used as a path
2. it can be used as the generator's name (e.g. Component name)
This is not intuitive as if we use via Nx Console because it creates
some ambiguity around the `--name` property which is normally described
as only 2.
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
What is expected is that the `name` property should only have the
responsibility of determining the name of the generated module
(Component, Directive etc...).
The new property `path` replaces the `directory` property but fulfils
the same purpose as determining where the module should be created.
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
---------
Co-authored-by: Jack Hsu <jack.hsu@gmail.com>
Fixing 3 issues when storing the page sections:
1. The heading of a node can be like this: `title: 'Angular Monorepo
Tutorial - Part 1: Code Generation' description: In this tutorial you'll
create a frontend-focused workspace with Nx`. We only want to keep the
`title` part.
2. Some headings have `{% highlightColor="green" %}`. We want to remove
that from the heading of the page section (and the link text)
3. There's an [error in `tags.json` where the path is
incorrect](https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/docs/generated/manifests/tags.json#L126).
We want to fix that on the fly, so that the embeddings script finds the
correct pages.
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
This repo uses Nx `19.4.0-rc.1`
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
This repo uses Nx `19.5.0-beta.5`
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
