This pull request includes changes to migrate ESLint configuration files
from CommonJS (`.cjs`) to ECMAScript modules (`.mjs`) as the default.
### ESLint Configuration Generation Changes
The changes also ensure consistent generated eslint configs based on the
base eslint config.
- If the workspace root has an `eslint.config.cjs` or `eslint.config.js`
with `module.exports`. When you create a library or application it will
generate an accompanying config at path
`{projectRoot}/eslint.config.cjs` of the same format.
- If the workspace root has an `eslint.config.mjs` or
`eslint.config.mjs` with `export default`. When you create a library or
application it will generate an accompanying config at path
`{projectRoot}/eslint.config.mjs`.
- If no eslint config is found at the workspace root one will be created
`eslint.config.mjs`
This PR updates our generators to use `eslint.config.cjs` instead of
`eslint.config.js` so that Node resolution will treat it as CommonJS.
This solves an issue where having `"type": "module"` in `package.json`
will result in an error when Node tries to resolve the config file as
ESM.
Also allows us to clean up out Remix generators to not have to rename to
`eslint.config.cjs` to solve the same issue.
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
when create fresh angular or react integrated project no eslint
extension out of the box. Few years ago I fill the issue
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/issues/7047 about deprecated tslint extension
looks like that has been deleted but without change to eslint extension
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
when I create angular / react project eslint extension should be added
to recommended vscode extensions
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
…ets (#23264)"
This reverts commit 85c89160
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
Calculating conflicts in target names does not consider if the
project.json defined targets will actually be impacted by the plugin
that wants to be added creating false negatives
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
Calculating conflicts should be more accurate
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes#22476
